23 replies to this topic

[Seneca]

Dr. Woo, on 22 April 2012 - 04:37 AM, said:

Seneca, on 21 April 2012 - 10:04 PM, said:

These women fully understood prior to becoming nuns that they were required to accept and abide by the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church.

You say that like the fact that they are daring to challenge the religious oligarchy and it's ridicules system of rule making by the prior degree of some dead imposter intermediary between God and man is a bad thing

How is it different from what some peoples here at PWR accused Mam of doing? Namely, that she was daring to challenge the established order. Whether what has been established is good or bad is not at issue.

[Pulgosa]

Pray for you sinners...

[Seneca]

Guest, on 22 April 2012 - 06:23 AM, said:

Fuck Mam

Precisely my point.

The Vatican is treating these nuns no differently from the way some peoples here at PWR do Mam.

[Seneca]

Guest, on 22 April 2012 - 07:52 AM, said:

Seneca, on 22 April 2012 - 07:47 AM, said:

Guest, on 22 April 2012 - 06:23 AM, said:

Fuck Mam

Precisely my point.

The Vatican is treating these nuns no differently from the way some peoples here at PWR do Mam.

So what's your point? Is mam a radical reformer to be praised? Or should she have known better and quit trying change pwr to her vision of "perfection"?

One person's freedom fighter is another's terrorist and vice versa.

I was merely pointing out the irony.

[Marajit]

Had it not been for a radical nun, there would have been no Marajit.

God bless you, sister Nancy, wherever you may be you will always live in my heart.